Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
Q is empty.
The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F2(c, c) -> F2(a, a)
F2(s1(X), c) -> F2(X, c)
F2(a, b) -> F2(s1(a), c)
F2(a, a) -> F2(a, b)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F2(c, c) -> F2(a, a)
F2(s1(X), c) -> F2(X, c)
F2(a, b) -> F2(s1(a), c)
F2(a, a) -> F2(a, b)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using an argument filtering and a montonic ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented.
F2(c, c) -> F2(a, a)
Used argument filtering: F2(x1, x2) = x1
c = c
a = a
s1(x1) = x1
Used ordering: Quasi Precedence:
c > a
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F2(s1(X), c) -> F2(X, c)
F2(a, b) -> F2(s1(a), c)
F2(a, a) -> F2(a, b)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F2(s1(X), c) -> F2(X, c)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using an argument filtering and a montonic ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented.
F2(s1(X), c) -> F2(X, c)
Used argument filtering: F2(x1, x2) = x1
s1(x1) = s1(x1)
Used ordering: Quasi Precedence:
trivial
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f2(a, a) -> f2(a, b)
f2(a, b) -> f2(s1(a), c)
f2(s1(X), c) -> f2(X, c)
f2(c, c) -> f2(a, a)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f2(a, a)
f2(a, b)
f2(s1(x0), c)
f2(c, c)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.